Ayodhya Judgment-the undisputed facts- The Cut off date

Ayodhya Judgment-the undisputed facts- The Cut off date-

By Robby Sharma 05-10-2010

The Ayodhya Judgment was delivered by the Allahabad High Court on 30th September-2010 and the following are the undisputed facts:-

1. That till the Ayodhya Judgment, the claims of the Hindus, that the Muslim Invaders had demolished thousands of Hindu ( Including Buddhist ) religious structures and built their places of worship and graveyards and Tombs as well as palaces over the Site were always passed of as imaginary without proof but now it has been established, both by Judicial pronouncements as well as Archeological and Scientific Evidence that Yes the Muslim Invaders did demolish thousands of Religious structures belonging to other Religions.
2. Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav as also the Muslims want that the Courts should only take a cut off date ,in relevance, which suits them i.e. The Courts should not take in to Account the status and ownership of the Site, which existed prior to 1528 the alleged date of demolition of Hindu Religious Place and Construction of Mosque and the Court should not take in to Account the Status after 1949, after Partition, when again the Idols were placed in the Central Dome. What they say is that only the Dates between 1528 to1949 should be the relevant Cut off dates and status of Mosque should be recognized. Now I wish to point out that Religious structures of Hindus and other Religions were destroyed by Muslims by the force of their swords. (Even Christians destroyed the Religious structures of other religions when they had the power of the sword on their side. They took away the Land of the Hindus and gave it away to converted Christians, all over India including Goa and it was only when the brave Hindu Kings like Shivaji, Ranjit Singh, Guru Gobind Singh and others became powerful that the Hindus were able to get back some of their lost properties). What these Invaders and their Successors wish to be legalized by the Courts is that once a foe has been subjugated by force, all his Right to regain his property ( when he gets the power to take it back ) should be lost forever to him. Going by their contention Ram never had the Right to regain Sita, who was abducted by Ravan.
3. That can not be so take the example of Israel, the Jews, the oldest of the lot i.e. Jews ,Christians and Muslims in that order, regained after centuries what was grabbed by other religions from them like Jerusalem and all their other religious places belonging to them and that too after thousands of years, when they gained the power to regain these places.
4. That therefore as far as other mundane property is concerned, if such property is taken forcibly from him , may be in a barbaric Society the original owner loses his Title and Right to regain it immediately after the event and even in Civil Societies he may loose it after a few decades or centuries but as regards the matters of faith, the Right, to, regain the Places of Faith, Lost , to an invader will always remain with the original faithful for eternity.
5. One other noticeable fact after the Ayodhya Judgment was the Contempt and rightly so with which Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad the Advocate of Hindu parties and BJP M.P, treated the Hindu Bashing , Pseudo Secularist Media Bigwigs like Barkha Dutt, Arnav Goswami, Pranoy Roy, Rajdeep Sardesai and Ashtosh , who get their bread and butter from Islamic Sheikhs and the Church and whose sole aim and profession is Hindu Bashing. Hats off to Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad.
6. Please take an oath that in matters of faith do not ,repeat do not rely on the Courts as the Constitution has not provided for the undoing of the wrongs committed by the Invaders. The Supreme Court may undo the High Court Judgment .It will be in the interests of Muslims to do some introspection and ask the Hindus for a small list of other such very important places, sacred to the Hindus ,which were destroyed by the Muslim Invaders ( even their own Historians recorded the plunder of the Hindu Temples and the facts are known to all ) and then offer to restore them to the Hindus if the Archeological evidence supports their claim and it will be in the interest of the Nation that the Hindus keep such a list as short as possible and resolve the matter once and for all.

Madhuri Gupta the Spy love or plain Lust

Madhuri Gupta the Spy love or plain Lust
27-05-2010

The News Channels Glorified her by saying that there was a love angle behind her spying Activities. Now why must Love be so degraded, it was nothing but Lust or plain craving for sex and money which was behind her evil deed and this should have been highlighted by the Media.
I have been researching the subject and have reached the conclusion that Ugly Men or women should never be given top posts in bureaucracy as their inferiority Complex forces them to seek publicity at any cost.
I recollect that in Kanpur, there was this I.A. S. officer N.N. Prasad , Vice Chairman of Kanpur Development Authority, a truly ugly man. He was publicity crazy like hell and not a day would pass before he would call the press and give some sort of interview to them highlighting some imaginary gallant deeds he was doing on the post. Millions of Rupees were distributed to the Press-walas through the Care taker of this cash rich but totally corrupt Authority. One leading newspaper magnate of Kanpur printed his interview on 3rd of October, 1999 praising him and the next day this ugly fellow sent a proposal to allot to the Newspaper owners a ten thousand plus square meter Garden Plot on the biggest Cremation Ghat of Kanpur for building a Multiplex Cinema cum Mall and finally allotted it to them.
Similarly One Anita Bhatnagar Jain another I.A.S , while she was Commissioner of Kanpur /Vice Chairperson K.D.A was a ugly midget and like N.N. Prasad she could not bear the thought of a day without seeing her picture in the News papers she also spent lakhs of rupees of K.D.A’s ill gotten do number ka paisa (load on contractors and Touts and officers through the care taker.) on pleasing the Press walas in good humor.
I used to attend some seminars on Environment Issues those days in the Merchant Chamber they were hosted by one Rakesh Jaiswal who ran a N.G.O. Eco friends. Every time she used to be the chief guest and every thing would be serious and quite till she made her entry and along with her appeared a full battery of Press Photographers and Reporters as if they appeared out of her body itself. I remember a Movie “Shogun’s Ninja” in this movie the villain had two ghost like evil creatures who during a fight used to appear from the Shogun’s Arse and kill his opponents. I stopped attending the meetings in disgust.
Therefore my advise to the Government is not to post ugly I.A.S or I.F.S officers to sensitive posts.
Look at it the other way also, Laloo Prasad , Mulayam Singh and many others, who are facing C.B.I probes for ill-gotten wealth now what do they have in common. You will find hundreds of such examples of ugly people on high posts ,they are all publicity crazy and mostly corrupt. What is more they become so only when they hold high posts not if they have a normal status. Remember Advani was also under the Hawala cloud, look at Chandra swami, Shibu Soren, Bangaru Laxman, A Raja Karuna nidhi, Lalit Modi , Hooda, , Narain Dutt Tiwari, Arjun Singh, Badal and the like. Look at Amitabh Bachan, Shahrukh Khan, Amar Singh & Sanjay Dutt, all ugly and always in News and controversies. I may be wrong but I have a strong hunch that I am right.
On the other hand look at Madhav Rao Scindia, Jai Ram Ramesh, Sachin Pilot, Jitin Prasad, Rajiv Gandhi, Rahul , Priyanka, Sonia, Nitish Kumar, all charming people with radiant faces and you will never hear about any such lowly ill deeds attributed to them, with the exception of Tharoor.

Robby Sharma