Jan Lok Pal Bill proposed and drafted by Anna Hazare & his Team. Whether it is Unconstitutional?

Jan Lok Pal Bill proposed and drafted by Anna Hazare & his Team. Whether it is Unconstitutional?

06-04-2011

Sir

Contrary to what the Government Spokesmen have been claiming on TV channels, there is nothing in the Constitution of India which prevented private Citizens from proposing a BILL however the Parliament afterwards made the procedure for conduct of its business and then made provision only for Government Bills and Private Members Bill. Even then the Bill only needs to be introduced either by a Minister or a Private Member. There is nothing in the Constitution which says any thing about drafting of the Bill. Therefore the stand of the Government that by allowing privately drafted bill it will mean opening a Pandora’s Box and Unconstitutional is totally Wrong.

Whether Civil Society can Join in Drafting of Jan Lok Pal Bill

06 April-2011

1. There is nothing in the Constitution about who will draft the Bill.

2. In the Constitution there are only two types of Bills, Money Bills and other Bills. There is nothing in the Constitution which disallows Private Citizens Bills.

3. Later on, when the Parliament made rules for conduct of Business, they provided for two types of Bills, Government Bills to be introduced and not necessarily drafted by the Minister of Concerned Department and Private Members Bill, to be introduced and not necessarily drafted by the Member of Parliament.

4. That thus the Government has merely to take the Jan Lokpal Bill drafted by the Team of Anna Hazare and after due deliberations, GET IT INTRODUCED BY THE MINISTER OF THE CONCERNED DEPARTMENT AND GET IT PASSED. Or A private Member of Parliament can take it and introduce it in Parliament.

In British & American Parliament/ Congress, private Citizens Bills are allowed to be introduced and passed for certain purposes. Some extracts are as below:

Robby Sharma

865, Block-B, Panki Kanpur.208020

Email—sharmarobby@hotmail.com Mob-91-9415438326

Bills in British Parliament

Different types of Bills can be introduced by:

· The government

· Individual MPs or Lords

· Private individuals or organisations

There are three different types of Bill: Public, Private and Hybrid Bills. There is also another kind of Public Bill called Private Members' Bills.

Private Bills are usually promoted by organisations, like local authorities or private companies, to give themselves powers beyond, or in conflict with, the general law. Private Bills only change the law as it applies to specific individuals or organisations, rather than the general public. Groups or individuals potentially affected by these changes can petition Parliament against the proposed Bill and present their objections to committees of MPs and Lords.

How Private Bills start

Bills can start in either House. The formal stages of Private Bills are broadly the same as Public Bills.

Letting the public know

Parliament requires that Private Bills are publicised through newspaper adverts, official gazettes of local areas, and in writing to all interested parties. People directly affected by a Private Bill - for example, residents near a proposed site for a new cemetery - should also be informed.

Petitioning against Private Bills

Any group or individual directly affected by a Bill's proposals can object to it through petitions, examined and considered by committees of MPs and of Lords. Further details on drafting a petition are available from the Private Bill Offices in the Commons and Lords.

Private Bills before Parliament 2010-11

Listed below are all Private Bills currently before Parliament. Any Bills which start in the Lords have [HL] in their title. Explanatory Notes and Amendments are on each Bill's individual page.

Bills search options:

1. All Bills Public Bills Private Bills Hybrid Bills

2.

3.

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

Current House	Bill title	Last updated
	A
	Allhallows Staining Church Bill [HL]	04.02.2011
	B
	Bank of Ireland (UK) plc Bill	04.04.2011
	C
	Canterbury City Council Bill	20.10.2010
	City of London (Various Powers) Bill [HL]	27.01.2011
	City of Westminster Bill [HL]	28.10.2010
	K
	Kent County Council (Filming on Highways) Bill [HL]	04.02.2011
	L
	Leeds City Council Bill	17.03.2011
	London Local Authorities Bill [HL]	03.04.2011
	London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill [HL]	31.03.2011
	N
	Nottingham City Council Bill	20.10.2010
	R
	Reading Borough Council Bill	20.10.2010
	T
	Transport for London (Supplemental Toll Provisions) Bill [HL]	29.11.2010
	Transport for London Bill [HL]	10.02.2011

Allhallows Staining Church Bill [HL] 2009-10 to 2010-11

Read the Act
All Bill documents

Type of Bill:

Private Bill

Parliamentary agents:

Bircham Dyson Bell LLP

Promoted by:

The Clothworkers' Company

Petitioning period:

Lords: 26.1.2010 to 8.2.2010 Commons: 19.3.2010 to 29.3.2010

Progress of the Bill

Bill started in theHouse of Lords

1. House of Lords

1.

2.

3.

4.

2. House of Commons

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

3.

4. Royal Assent

Last event

· alt="Royal Assent" title="Royal Assent" v:shapes="_x0000_i1052">Royal Assent 27 July, 2010 | 27.07.2010

All previous stages of the Bill

Latest news on the Bill

The Bill received Royal Assent on 27 July 2010. It is now an Act of Parliament (i.e. it has become law): Allhallows Staining Church Act 2010 (Chapter v).

Petition information

The Bill received Royal Assent on 27 July 2010. It is now an Act of Parliament (i.e. it has become law): Allhallows Staining Church Act 2010 (Chapter v). There will be no further opportunities to present petitions against this Bill.

Summary of the Bill

This Bill removes certain statutory restrictions applying to land which makes up the site of the former church of Allhallows Staining, its churchyard, and other adjoining land in the City of London. It would:

· repeal sections 4(2)(b) to (e) of the Allhallows Staining Churchyard Act 1961 to remove certain restrictions placed by the 1961 Act on the churchyard relating to the licensing process when seeking to disturb a grave; accessing a grave in the churchyard; access rights of the incumbent of the united benefices of St Olave Hart Street, Allhallows Staining and St Katherine Coleman; and the erection of buildings on the churchyard

· make provision for the legal use, development or disposal of the land stipulated in the Bill. It would, however, be necessary to obtain permissions from any individuals affected along with the normal planning and listed building consents

· impose detailed procedures to be followed by the company (the Livery Company known as the Clothworkers’ Company - the sponsor of the Bill) when seeking to remove human remains

· make provision for the removal and re-erection of tombstones and memorials. The selection of the new location would be agreed by the relative of the deceased person or their representative

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Legislation, Laws, and Acts

Chapter 1: Bills
Chapter 2: Joint Resolutions
Chapter 3: Concurrent Resolutions
Chapter 4: Simple Resolutions

Bills

Bills are prefixed with H.R. when introduced in the House and S. when introduced in the Senate, and they are followed by a number based on the order in which they are introduced. The vast majority of legislative proposals are in the form of bills. Bills deal with domestic and foreign issues and programs, and they also appropriate money to various government agencies and programs.

Public bills pertain to matters that affect the general public or classes of citizens, while private bills affect just certain individuals and organizations.

A private bill provides benefits to specified individuals (including corporate bodies). Individuals sometimes request relief through private legislation when administrative or legal remedies are exhausted. Many private bills deal with immigration–granting citizenship or permanent residency. Private bills may also be introduced for individuals who have claims again the government, veterans benefits claims, claims for military decorations, or taxation problems. The title of a private bill usually begins with the phrase, "For the relief of. . . ." If a private bill is passed in identical form by both houses of Congress and is signed by the president, it becomes a private law.

When bills are passed in identical form by both Chambers of Congress and signed by the president (or repassed by Congress over a presidential veto), they become laws.

Joint Resolutions

Joint resolutions are designated H.J. Res. or S.J. Res. and are followed by a number. Like a bill, a joint resolution requires the approval of both Chambers in identical form and the president’s signature to become law. There is no real difference between a joint resolution and a bill. The joint resolution is generally used for continuing or emergency appropriations. Joint resolutions are also used for proposing amendments to the Constitution; such resolutions must be approved by two-thirds of both Chambers and three-fourths of the states, but do not require the president’s signature to become part of the Constitution.

Concurrent Resolutions

Concurrent resolutions, which are designated H.Con. Res. or S.Con. Res., and followed by a number, must be passed in the same form by both houses, but they do not require the signature of the president and do not have the force of law. Concurrent resolutions are generally used to make or amend rules that apply to both houses. They are also used to express the sentiments of both of the houses. For example, a concurrent resolution is used to set the time of Congress’ adjournment. It may also be used by Congress to convey congratulations to another country on the anniversary of its independence. Another important use of the concurrent resolution is for the annual congressional budget resolution, which sets Congress’ revenue and spending goals for the upcoming fiscal year.

Simple Resolutions

Simple resolutions are designated H.Res. and S.Res., followed by a number. A simple resolution addresses matters entirely within the prerogative of one house, such as revising the standing rules of one Chamber. Simple resolutions are also used to express the sentiments of a single house, such as offering condolences to the family of a deceased member of Congress, or it may give "advice" on foreign policy or other executive business. Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the president, and they do not have the force of law.

Laundering of Black Money & bringing it back to India

How the Criminals & Corrupt Politicians/ Bureaucrats are laundering Black Money & bringing it back to India? Very simple:- 06-04-2011.

1. Earn 1000 Crores by Crime or Corruption or Tax evasion.
2. Send it by Hawala to the Black Money Account in a Tax Haven Country preferably opened in name of a company.
3. Transfer money periodically to yet another Company in same or another Tax Haven Country.
4. Open a Company in name of your close relative or associate/s in India, for doing Online Surveys for various products.
5. Your Tax Haven based Company hires your Indian relatives Company to do online survey of some products, on behalf of some imaginary Clients and pays the Indian Company a staggering amount of money for each survey say 100 dollars each.
6. Your Indian Company makes online franchisees and agents in India and offers them ten dollars for each survey (a staggering amount for spending just ten minutes online to complete a Survey.
7. Your Indian Company makes profit of ninety dollars minus some nominal expenses on each survey.
8. Within months the number of Franchisees/ agents doing online Survey consisting only of their personal opinion swells to Lakhs, who earn about Rs ten thousand a month by spending just minutes on line.
9. Your Indian Company makes profit of about 900 crores on its 1000 Crores inflow amount (bribe or crime money sent by you abroad earlier.), in a few months. Pay tax on this and your black money is Home for You. The Agents and Franchisees doing online Survey for you suddenly find that their opinion is not needed any more. No crime is committed in India, every thing is above board.
10. Some Punjab Politicians have made a Online Survey Company in Singapore, speakasia and it will remain online till their money is Laundered or they find more Clients , who wish to avail their services for Laundering their money.
11. You can further save even on the Tax payable in India by registering a branch of your Company abroad and bringing in the profit as remittance or dividend.

Robby Sharma -865, Block-B, Panki Kanpur-208020

Email-sharmarobbyhotmail.com -mob-91-9415438326

Ayodhya Judgment-the undisputed facts- The Cut off date

Ayodhya Judgment-the undisputed facts- The Cut off date-

By Robby Sharma 05-10-2010

The Ayodhya Judgment was delivered by the Allahabad High Court on 30th September-2010 and the following are the undisputed facts:-

1. That till the Ayodhya Judgment, the claims of the Hindus, that the Muslim Invaders had demolished thousands of Hindu ( Including Buddhist ) religious structures and built their places of worship and graveyards and Tombs as well as palaces over the Site were always passed of as imaginary without proof but now it has been established, both by Judicial pronouncements as well as Archeological and Scientific Evidence that Yes the Muslim Invaders did demolish thousands of Religious structures belonging to other Religions.
2. Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav as also the Muslims want that the Courts should only take a cut off date ,in relevance, which suits them i.e. The Courts should not take in to Account the status and ownership of the Site, which existed prior to 1528 the alleged date of demolition of Hindu Religious Place and Construction of Mosque and the Court should not take in to Account the Status after 1949, after Partition, when again the Idols were placed in the Central Dome. What they say is that only the Dates between 1528 to1949 should be the relevant Cut off dates and status of Mosque should be recognized. Now I wish to point out that Religious structures of Hindus and other Religions were destroyed by Muslims by the force of their swords. (Even Christians destroyed the Religious structures of other religions when they had the power of the sword on their side. They took away the Land of the Hindus and gave it away to converted Christians, all over India including Goa and it was only when the brave Hindu Kings like Shivaji, Ranjit Singh, Guru Gobind Singh and others became powerful that the Hindus were able to get back some of their lost properties). What these Invaders and their Successors wish to be legalized by the Courts is that once a foe has been subjugated by force, all his Right to regain his property ( when he gets the power to take it back ) should be lost forever to him. Going by their contention Ram never had the Right to regain Sita, who was abducted by Ravan.
3. That can not be so take the example of Israel, the Jews, the oldest of the lot i.e. Jews ,Christians and Muslims in that order, regained after centuries what was grabbed by other religions from them like Jerusalem and all their other religious places belonging to them and that too after thousands of years, when they gained the power to regain these places.
4. That therefore as far as other mundane property is concerned, if such property is taken forcibly from him , may be in a barbaric Society the original owner loses his Title and Right to regain it immediately after the event and even in Civil Societies he may loose it after a few decades or centuries but as regards the matters of faith, the Right, to, regain the Places of Faith, Lost , to an invader will always remain with the original faithful for eternity.
5. One other noticeable fact after the Ayodhya Judgment was the Contempt and rightly so with which Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad the Advocate of Hindu parties and BJP M.P, treated the Hindu Bashing , Pseudo Secularist Media Bigwigs like Barkha Dutt, Arnav Goswami, Pranoy Roy, Rajdeep Sardesai and Ashtosh , who get their bread and butter from Islamic Sheikhs and the Church and whose sole aim and profession is Hindu Bashing. Hats off to Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad.
6. Please take an oath that in matters of faith do not ,repeat do not rely on the Courts as the Constitution has not provided for the undoing of the wrongs committed by the Invaders. The Supreme Court may undo the High Court Judgment .It will be in the interests of Muslims to do some introspection and ask the Hindus for a small list of other such very important places, sacred to the Hindus ,which were destroyed by the Muslim Invaders ( even their own Historians recorded the plunder of the Hindu Temples and the facts are known to all ) and then offer to restore them to the Hindus if the Archeological evidence supports their claim and it will be in the interest of the Nation that the Hindus keep such a list as short as possible and resolve the matter once and for all.

Madhuri Gupta the Spy love or plain Lust

Madhuri Gupta the Spy love or plain Lust
27-05-2010

The News Channels Glorified her by saying that there was a love angle behind her spying Activities. Now why must Love be so degraded, it was nothing but Lust or plain craving for sex and money which was behind her evil deed and this should have been highlighted by the Media.
I have been researching the subject and have reached the conclusion that Ugly Men or women should never be given top posts in bureaucracy as their inferiority Complex forces them to seek publicity at any cost.
I recollect that in Kanpur, there was this I.A. S. officer N.N. Prasad , Vice Chairman of Kanpur Development Authority, a truly ugly man. He was publicity crazy like hell and not a day would pass before he would call the press and give some sort of interview to them highlighting some imaginary gallant deeds he was doing on the post. Millions of Rupees were distributed to the Press-walas through the Care taker of this cash rich but totally corrupt Authority. One leading newspaper magnate of Kanpur printed his interview on 3rd of October, 1999 praising him and the next day this ugly fellow sent a proposal to allot to the Newspaper owners a ten thousand plus square meter Garden Plot on the biggest Cremation Ghat of Kanpur for building a Multiplex Cinema cum Mall and finally allotted it to them.
Similarly One Anita Bhatnagar Jain another I.A.S , while she was Commissioner of Kanpur /Vice Chairperson K.D.A was a ugly midget and like N.N. Prasad she could not bear the thought of a day without seeing her picture in the News papers she also spent lakhs of rupees of K.D.A’s ill gotten do number ka paisa (load on contractors and Touts and officers through the care taker.) on pleasing the Press walas in good humor.
I used to attend some seminars on Environment Issues those days in the Merchant Chamber they were hosted by one Rakesh Jaiswal who ran a N.G.O. Eco friends. Every time she used to be the chief guest and every thing would be serious and quite till she made her entry and along with her appeared a full battery of Press Photographers and Reporters as if they appeared out of her body itself. I remember a Movie “Shogun’s Ninja” in this movie the villain had two ghost like evil creatures who during a fight used to appear from the Shogun’s Arse and kill his opponents. I stopped attending the meetings in disgust.
Therefore my advise to the Government is not to post ugly I.A.S or I.F.S officers to sensitive posts.
Look at it the other way also, Laloo Prasad , Mulayam Singh and many others, who are facing C.B.I probes for ill-gotten wealth now what do they have in common. You will find hundreds of such examples of ugly people on high posts ,they are all publicity crazy and mostly corrupt. What is more they become so only when they hold high posts not if they have a normal status. Remember Advani was also under the Hawala cloud, look at Chandra swami, Shibu Soren, Bangaru Laxman, A Raja Karuna nidhi, Lalit Modi , Hooda, , Narain Dutt Tiwari, Arjun Singh, Badal and the like. Look at Amitabh Bachan, Shahrukh Khan, Amar Singh & Sanjay Dutt, all ugly and always in News and controversies. I may be wrong but I have a strong hunch that I am right.
On the other hand look at Madhav Rao Scindia, Jai Ram Ramesh, Sachin Pilot, Jitin Prasad, Rajiv Gandhi, Rahul , Priyanka, Sonia, Nitish Kumar, all charming people with radiant faces and you will never hear about any such lowly ill deeds attributed to them, with the exception of Tharoor.

Robby Sharma

Origin of the Marwari’s wealth

Origin of the Marwari’s wealth
Posted on 18th October-2009
Here is what an enlightened gentleman in Rajasthan told me about the origin of the Marwari’s wealth:-
In the barren desert of Rajasthan, where no agriculture was possible,the only thing which grew in abundance was shrubs and dry grass, as a result hundreds of Nomadic families, who owned lakhs of Cattle, Sheep, Camels etc used to roam the country side, including other States to graze them, the entire families/tribes accompanied the herds, which were many miles long (I myself came across never ending rows of sheep, for miles and miles and that too in early seventies) and once or twice a year , they used to return to their villages and when they used to sell or sheer their cattle, they were faced with the predicament of safeguarding the money realized, as they were roaming around most of the year, easy target for bandits.
The local, cunning Marwaris living in small towns used to charge them interest for keeping their money safe and at the same time used the money to lend to Kings and Nawabs in their hard times and later on invested this money in big towns like Calcutta, Madras, Bombay, Kanpur etc etc in money lending and Industrial ventures.
Thus they realized double profit on the money, as safekeeping fee from the owners of the money and on account of interest earned from those to whom they lent it or in the industrial ventures they undertook by that money.
That is what is called Aam ke Aam Guthlion ke daam.
From the abject poverty widespread in Marwar /Rajasthan it seems that many of the actual owners of the money were not paid back and many perished, while roaming, at the hands of Muslim invaders, while the Marwari grew fat, wealthy and successful on the Nomad’s money.

Robby Sharma
(865, Block-B, Panki Kanpur 208020)
Mob-91-9235844258; 91-9415438326
sharmarobby@hotmail.com

PROPHECY-CHINA WILL OCCUPY INDIA

PROPHECY-CHINA WILL OCCUPY INDIA
By-Anton Johansson, Sweden (1858-1909)
Posted By Robby Sharma on 31-08-2009
sharmarobby@hotmail.com Mob-91-9415438326

Johansson predicted the following details:

1) India will be occupied by china.

2) New diseases used as weapons will cause 25 million people to die.

3) Persia and Turkey will be conquered by what seem to be Russian troops.

4) Revolutionaries will instigate unrest and war in India and Egypt to facilitate the occupation of India and Europe.

5) The Russians will conquer the Balkans.

6) There will be great destruction in Italy.

7) The "red storm" will approach France through Hungary, Austria, northern Italy and Switzerland. France will be conquered from inside and outside.

8) American supply depots will fall into Russian hands.

9) Germany will be attacked from the east.

10) There will be a civil war, Germans will fight against Germans.

11) The Eastern Bloc will cause a civil war in England.

12) Russia will lead a mass attack against the United States, so U.S. forces will be prevented from reinforcing Europe.

13) New weapons will cause huge hurricanes and firestorms in the USA where the largest cities will be destroyed.
(A)-- With respect to the above it is not clear whether the prophecy was only about Chinese Occupation of thousands of Square miles of India’s Land, which China already occupies or whether it predicts that Entire India will be occupied by China.
(B)-- Surely West Bengal has been already under occupation of the Communists for last thirty years and they the Communists had their allegiance towards China even during the 1962 Indo-China War so does it fulfill the Prophecy or is their still more to come.
( C)-- What is however certain is that the Church, which started the Balkanization of India by converting all the tribes of entire North East –India, will be the main culprit in the event of the Occupation of North East India by the Chinese, which is a certainty in about fifty years and who knows may be they will drive down the beautiful Highways being made under the Golden Quadrilateral Scheme.
(D)-- By Revolutionaries, what Johansson meant is not clear but recent News say that one third of India is under sphere of Naxalites (whom the Chinese and millions of Indians also see as revolutionaries) influence and surely it is bound to increase given the totally Corrupt Politician-Bureaucracy-Judiciary-Mafia-Black money-Elite combine, the Common man is not going to get any relief under the present set up and like I wrote earlier that by 2030 India will be the Biggest & Cheapest Brothel and Human organs market of the World. So pray and if possible learn Cantonese.
(E)-- When the worst happens, one can be sure that the Present crop of Politicians-Bureaucrats, Judges and the Super Rich and their Progeny will have flown to the Tax-Havens.

HOW CORRUPT CAN CORRUPT INDIANS BE

HOW CORRUPT CAN CORRUPT INDIANS BE

By Robby Sharma Kanpur ----------------19th August-2009
Mob-91-9415438326-Email- sharmarobby@hotmail.com
Here is what I got to hear from a Veterinary Doctor friend.
During the tenure of Morarji Desai as the P.M of India, In keeping with his policy of prohibition, it was decided to declare at least the Pilgrimage Centers as Liquor Free areas ( Madhya Nishedh Chetras) in U.P. The Birth place of Tulsidas, Rajapur was also chosen to be so declared and the then Minister in charge hailing from Kanpur was to address a function there and declare it as Liquor free Area.
The Excise Commissioner One Mr Lal and few of his cronies started in their Ambassador Car from Allahabad to make arrangements for the Ministers Visit. Their Car broke down and in those days the way to Rajapur was hazardous and even the BDO did not have a Jeep, there were none available on hire also. The Medical Officer posted in the Block & Doctor Sachan the Veterinary Doctor posted there offered to carry four persons including the Commissioner on their Motorcycles to the Rest House in Rajapur.
The Excice Commissioner was carrying a sealed wooden Crate, which could not be carried on the Motorcycle so Doctor Sachan advised that the Crate be opened and the contents carried in the side Dicky of the Motorcycle and partly in hand bags as they could not keep the Crate on the Motorcycle and still carry two passengers. With great reluctance the Excise Commissioner agreed and the crate was opened, it contained dozen or so Bottles of the finest liquor.
The Minister and his Entourage as well as the Commissioner and his party had a hearty Liquor Party with Chicken, mutton and other delicacies in the evening in the Rest house and in the Morning, The Minister paid Rich tributes to Tulsidas ji calling him a great saint and said the place of his birth was a sacred place and in front of the gathered crowd, he declared the Area as Liquor Free Zone (Madhya Nishedh Chetra).

Tags: Corrupt India. Shameless India.

Islamic Money Controls Indian Media & hundreds of NGO’s

Islamic Money Controls Indian Media & hundreds of NGO’s
By Robby Sharma------------- 18-08-2009
Mob:91-9235844258;91-9415438326
sharmarobby@hotmail.com
Ever wondered why one so called Mosque demolished in Ayodhya has bee shown thousands of times on News Channels and English print media but thousands of Temples demolished in Kashmir have never hit their screens or pages. Ever wondered why the fact of ethnic cleansing of Pandits from Kashmir never garnered the media Screens headlines.
Ever wondered why the Godhra carnage & the burnt Kar Sewaks & the Train went out from News channels and print media in a flash while the News about Atrocities committed on muslims in Gujrat refuse to exit the T.V screens.
Most of the English print media was already controlled by the Islamic Oil billions and after the TV media came in to being now it is they who are receiving billions of OIL dollars to show hate stories about so called Hindu fundamentalism. After the Godhra carnage and subsequent Gujrat riots, most of the media heavy weights were paid billions of rupees to espouse the Islamic cause, One Media reporter a she who often reports from the Bunker and another media stalwart one son of a famous India Cricketer are said to have been paid and are being paid crores and crores of Rupees of Oil money by the wealthy Sheikhs.
How the Muslim cause is being espoused by the Judiciary also needs to be kept watch of. Islamic money is now influencing the Judiciary in a big way. Ten Lakh Rupees interim Compensation has been awarded for the fake encounter case of a known criminal. Has the Supreme Court ever passed any order condemning the ethnic cleansing in Kashmir.
Most of the NGO’s headed by Magsaysay or Booker prize winners and other English speaking elite are striding the Courts and Political forums as they get fat on Islamic money routed to them through different channels. Did any of them ever say a word about the Godhra or Azamgarh carnages while they took the Best bakery case till the Supreme Court.

The likes of Tista Sitalwad, Arundhati Roy, Megha Patkar, Sunita Narain, Bunker Girl B.D and our own Mamta Didi, Brinda Karat & her other Commie friends as well as the entire Congress and Samajwadi fraternity get their Throats sore by shouting Anti Hindu Slogans. Were they to dare to go and raise their voices in Kashmir against the Islamic radicals in Kashmir for the Ethnic Cleansing of Hindus, I am sure that most of them would be raped, maimed & killed and their deaths blamed on the Security forces.

Ganga-A National River-How politicians break a country

Ganga- A National River-How politicians break a country

To Shri Manmohan Singh Ji 17-06-2009
the Prime Minister Of India
New Delhi

Respected Sir
1. I had written, earlier, a detailed article on River Pollution, specially about River Ganga to your good self on 22-06-2008. Since then you have declared the Ganga River as a National River and declared the formation of a Ganga Basin Authority. Sir people have applauded your action but I wish to lodge my protest for the same because I feel that it is such irresponsible acts of Politicians, which have been slowly breaking up the Country
2. I had in my earlier letter clearly mentioned that “The Government of India should immediately make suitable Legislation with reference to the entry at S.No.56 in the Seventh Schedule, Union List of the Constitution & immediately make suitable Legislation with regard to the Ganga & other Inter-State Rivers. Although in the end of that letter, I had also expressed my special anxiety for the Ganga, which action of mine, I myself regret, but you being the head of the family should have tried to treat everyone, every State and its people and the Rivers flowing through them alike.
3. That you have under pressure of various agitations, declared the River Ganga as a National River and also garnered much publicity. Are you waiting for people of other States, also hurt by the pollution of rivers, flowing through their states, to start agitating with respect to other Rivers, take to the Streets, before they can get the same Status for the Rivers, which are their very lifelines. Such actions of Politicians have been breaking up the Nation. Every four or five years, there are agitations saying that such and such part of such and such State is being discriminated against and there is demand for new State and many have been made and they may further, in future, turn in to Countries, who knows?
4. Therefore you should have made similar announcements for all other Inter-State rivers and should not have singled out the Ganga. More on the matter need not be said as it should be understood. Sir I condemn your action of singling out the Ganga for granting National River Status. It should be accorded to all other Rivers and the legislation, you have made under your powers given by the Constitution should be made regarding all the Rivers of all the States. Had you mentioned in your declaration that you would be making similar legislation in the shortest possible time for other Rivers also then your declaration could have been termed as a rational one but in the absence of such a assurance, it ,your declaration, smacks of appeasing a certain section of the electorate, before the recent elections.

Thanks
Yours truly
(Robby Sharma)
865, Block-B, Panki Kanpur-208020
Copy To:
1. Smt Sonia Gandhiji, 10, Janpath New Delhi.
2. Baba Ramdeo Ji, Patanjali Yog Peeth, District Haridwar Uttaranchal.
3. Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh, headquarters at Nagpur Maharashtra.
Tags- How to break a Country, Ganga-A National River,

Part-5-All good things come to an end in the Supreme Court of India-Nazul Free Hold Case of U.P.

Part-5-All good things come to an end in the Supreme Court of India-Nazul Free Hold Case of U.P.
Kanpur-16th -June-2009
For years during my Research on various topics including the Town Planning Laws of India, I have noted that it is on rare occasions possible for the general public of India to get a few orders from the High Courts, which go a long way in addressing the problems of the teeming masses but All such good things come to an end in the Supreme Court of India, which more often than not stays the Order of the High Court arbitrarily then keeps on sitting on the Petition for years, often decades altogether, resulting in denial of the Relief to the general public, which the High Court took pains to provide. I shall be discussing a few cases periodically, Some cases I am detailing below:-

1. The State of U.P was taking very heavy amount as premium for free hold of Nazul Land given on lease earlier while in the case of Free hold of plots given on lease by the Development Authorities and Awas Vikas Parishad, only a fraction was being charged .In a Land mark Judgment,dated-30-03-2006, the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc Writ Petition No.3341 of 1999 in the matter of Harish Tandon V/s State of U.P, found this to be discriminatory and in violation of Article 14. This Judgment would have benefited Lakhs of holders of Nazul leases.
2. However, as usual, before the general public could reap the benefit of the judgment of the High Court, the Supreme Court, aghast at the relief provided to the general public i.e. the insignificant common man, stayed the order and thereafter it has been sitting on the file for about three years. On top of it had taken 7 years in the Allahabad High Court and before that a considerable time in fighting before the Authorities. The Order of the Supreme Court reads:-ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.3 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).17245/2006 (From the judgement and order dated 30/03/2006 in CMWP No. 3341/1999 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS HARISH TANDON Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 03/11/2006 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. NAOLEKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Dr. R.G. Padia, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.W.A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Dubey, Adv. Mr. Fuzail Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashish Mohan, Adv. Mr. K.K. Mohan,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Leave granted. Until further orders, status quo as it exists today shall be maintained. (Rajesh Dham) (Madhu Saxena) Court Master Court Master
3. Till today, the case is pending and it is such a case in which it is most likely that the private party may have already reaped the benefit of the High Court Judgment and even otherwise may not even file a reply so the Case will meet a slow death in the Supreme Court and thus the benefit given to the common man by the Allahabad High Court has been denied to the public by the arbitrary and Authoritarian stay order of the Supreme court and it is more than possible that it will be denied forever because of the negotiating powers of the State Government. Therefore once the Supreme Court stays an order of the High Court of such a great public importance, it ought to and it should decide the case in maximum six months even if the respondents are served or not after all they do have the brains to decide the case even in absence of the reply or do they lack the brains and have to depend on the replies and arguments of advocates in which case the public will always loose as the State can afford to hire the most expensive Advocates at public cost and that too mostly to serve their egos and no public interest is involved in challenging the orders of the High Court.
4. This article will be continued regarding other cases, where the Public interest benefic Judgments passed by the High Courts have come to an end in the Supreme Court of India and have been pending since ages.
Robby Sharma
865, Block-B, Panki Kanpur-208020
email—sharmarobby@hotmail.com
Mob-91-9415438326;9235844258.

Tags- Supreme Court of India, All good things come to an End, Nazul Land Free hold case in U.P.