Ayodhya Judgment-the undisputed facts- The Cut off date-
By Robby Sharma 05-10-2010
The Ayodhya Judgment was delivered by the Allahabad High Court on 30th September-2010 and the following are the undisputed facts:-
1. That till the Ayodhya Judgment, the claims of the Hindus, that the Muslim Invaders had demolished thousands of Hindu ( Including Buddhist ) religious structures and built their places of worship and graveyards and Tombs as well as palaces over the Site were always passed of as imaginary without proof but now it has been established, both by Judicial pronouncements as well as Archeological and Scientific Evidence that Yes the Muslim Invaders did demolish thousands of Religious structures belonging to other Religions.
2. Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav as also the Muslims want that the Courts should only take a cut off date ,in relevance, which suits them i.e. The Courts should not take in to Account the status and ownership of the Site, which existed prior to 1528 the alleged date of demolition of Hindu Religious Place and Construction of Mosque and the Court should not take in to Account the Status after 1949, after Partition, when again the Idols were placed in the Central Dome. What they say is that only the Dates between 1528 to1949 should be the relevant Cut off dates and status of Mosque should be recognized. Now I wish to point out that Religious structures of Hindus and other Religions were destroyed by Muslims by the force of their swords. (Even Christians destroyed the Religious structures of other religions when they had the power of the sword on their side. They took away the Land of the Hindus and gave it away to converted Christians, all over India including Goa and it was only when the brave Hindu Kings like Shivaji, Ranjit Singh, Guru Gobind Singh and others became powerful that the Hindus were able to get back some of their lost properties). What these Invaders and their Successors wish to be legalized by the Courts is that once a foe has been subjugated by force, all his Right to regain his property ( when he gets the power to take it back ) should be lost forever to him. Going by their contention Ram never had the Right to regain Sita, who was abducted by Ravan.
3. That can not be so take the example of Israel, the Jews, the oldest of the lot i.e. Jews ,Christians and Muslims in that order, regained after centuries what was grabbed by other religions from them like Jerusalem and all their other religious places belonging to them and that too after thousands of years, when they gained the power to regain these places.
4. That therefore as far as other mundane property is concerned, if such property is taken forcibly from him , may be in a barbaric Society the original owner loses his Title and Right to regain it immediately after the event and even in Civil Societies he may loose it after a few decades or centuries but as regards the matters of faith, the Right, to, regain the Places of Faith, Lost , to an invader will always remain with the original faithful for eternity.
5. One other noticeable fact after the Ayodhya Judgment was the Contempt and rightly so with which Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad the Advocate of Hindu parties and BJP M.P, treated the Hindu Bashing , Pseudo Secularist Media Bigwigs like Barkha Dutt, Arnav Goswami, Pranoy Roy, Rajdeep Sardesai and Ashtosh , who get their bread and butter from Islamic Sheikhs and the Church and whose sole aim and profession is Hindu Bashing. Hats off to Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad.
6. Please take an oath that in matters of faith do not ,repeat do not rely on the Courts as the Constitution has not provided for the undoing of the wrongs committed by the Invaders. The Supreme Court may undo the High Court Judgment .It will be in the interests of Muslims to do some introspection and ask the Hindus for a small list of other such very important places, sacred to the Hindus ,which were destroyed by the Muslim Invaders ( even their own Historians recorded the plunder of the Hindu Temples and the facts are known to all ) and then offer to restore them to the Hindus if the Archeological evidence supports their claim and it will be in the interest of the Nation that the Hindus keep such a list as short as possible and resolve the matter once and for all.
